Exhaustive study discussing ocean marine carbon dioxide removal via iron fertilization

21 December 2023

In order to restrict the global warming to 1.5 °C, it is necessary to remove, before the year 2100, up to 1000 Gt of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO₂), in addition to huge emission reduction efforts. Today, there is renewed interest in ocean iron fertilization (OIF) for large-scale carbon dioxide removal (CDR) operations and OIF is still a widely considered method within the marine method CDR portfolio.

The analysis presented by Bach and his colleagues (2023, see reference below) considers different biogeochemical variables that affect the CDR efficiency of OIF: (a) to use preformed nutrients from the lower overturning circulation cell; (b) for prevailing iron-limitation; (c) for sufficient underwater light for photosynthesis; (d) for efficient carbon sequestration; (e) for sufficient air-sea CO₂ transfer.

Instead of biogeochemical modelling, their approach favours to use a range of observational, experimental, and computational data sources to assemble the necessary information and compile it in equations to derive estimates of OIF cost-efficiency. In other words, these 5 criteria were assessed consecutively and finally synthesized into spatially resolved costs per tonne of CO₂ removed.

Their findings on (cost-)efficiency provide little incentive to further explore OIF in the open Southern Ocean south of 60°S, except perhaps some Antarctic shelf regions (e.g., Ross Sea shelf), where the CDR costs can be <100 US$/tonne CO₂ while they are mainly >>1,000 US$/tonne CO₂ in offshore regions of the Southern Ocean. However, even if future research confirmed a high (cost-)efficiency on Antarctic shelves, it raises legal questions because regions close to Antarctica fall under three overlapping (and environmentally protective) layers of international law.

**Figure: Outline and the two major goals of the ocean iron fertilization (OIF) analysis.** Goal 1 is to assess the five requirements that should be met (or maximized) for OIF to be meaningful and/or (cost-)efficient. The value of this exercise is to localize areas in the Southern Ocean where OIF could be more or less effective. Goal 2 is to provide circumpolar maps of OIF (cost-)efficiency. Three of the five requirements in the focus here (pre-formed nutrients, iron limitation, light limitation) are used only to help constrain suitable OIF areas but these are not further considered for the analysis of OIF (cost-)efficiency, due to the reasons described in Sections 3.1.1–3.1.3 of the paper (see reference below). The other two of the five requirements (carbon storage in AABW, air-sea CO₂ equilibration), are utilised also for estimating OIF (cost-)efficiency.

Reference:

Bach, L. T., Tamsitt, V., Baldry, K., McGee, J., Laurenceau‐Cornec, E. C., Strzepek, R. F., Xie, Y., & Boyd, P. W. (2023). Identifying the Most (Cost‐)Efficient Regions for CO2 Removal with Iron Fertilization in the Southern Ocean. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 37. doi:10.1029/2023gb007754

Rechercher